Family Law · The Family Division of the High Court
N and S (Habitual Residence), Re
Facts
The applicant mother (M), a British national serving as a senior diplomat, and the respondent father (F), a dual British and American national, are the parents of two boys, N (12) and S (10). The children were born in England and lived here continuously until 19 September 2025, when the family moved to State A at the commencement of M's four-year posting, due to run until September 2029. The move initially went well, but in December 2025 the relationship broke down. M alleged that F had assaulted her; an FCDO investigation into events on 22 December 2025 concluded only that an altercation had likely taken place, and F was required to leave the FCDO platform in State A. F, for his part, alleged that M had abused alcohol for years, producing extensive statements, journal entries recording her drinking, and covert recordings both of M when inebriated and of a 50-minute conversation with N. M countered that F had distorted her drinking to gaslight and control her. On 16 February 2026 M applied for the summary return of the children to State A under the 1980 Hague Convention, the children having left State A on 2 February 2026. The central question was whether the boys had acquired habitual residence in State A.
What did the court decide?
The decision, the issues, the court’s reasoning and the case history are for subscribers. One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.
Subscribe to Family Law Or take the free digestAlready a subscriber? Sign in.