Administrative / Public Law · The Administrative Court (King's Bench Division)
BB, R (on the application of) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Checked against the judgment on 5 August 2026 · how we verify
Facts
BB was arrested in May 2024 on suspicion of coercive and controlling behaviour towards his former partner, Z, and later arrested and charged with breaching a non-molestation order made against him; he faces trial on indictment, listed for November 2026. Metropolitan Police officers, including the officer in the case, DC Archer, communicated with Z by WhatsApp, exporting some conversations as evidential material but not others, and a second witness statement disclosed further exports that had earlier been overlooked. BB brought judicial review proceedings against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis challenging the Commissioner's Guidance on the use of WhatsApp and other instant messaging apps on MPS-issued devices, in particular the instruction that officers activate the 'disappearing messages' function so that WhatsApp conversations are automatically deleted ninety days after receipt without a reliable retention mechanism. He advanced four grounds: that the Guidance authorised unlawful conduct contrary to Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; that it frustrated the purposes of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 contrary to Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; that it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and that it unjustifiably interfered with his right to a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR and at common law. Permission was granted on all four grounds by Sarah Clarke KC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, on 4 November 2025, and McKendrick J heard the claim over two days in May 2026, with further evidence and submissions filed afterwards.
What did the court decide?
Four things on this page are for subscribers:
- The decision: what the court actually held
- The issues: the questions it had to answer
- The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
- The case history: every step, court by court
CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.
One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.
See the plans Or take the free digestOn your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.