Intellectual Property Law  /  [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC)

Intellectual Property Law · The Business and Property Courts (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court)

DLP Limited v Coram UK Holding Limited

Court The Business and Property Courts (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court)Date 25 September 2026Citation [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC)Source Find Case Law

Checked against the judgment on 30 September 2026 · how we verify

Facts

DLP Limited owns UK Patent No GB 2,446,666, titled "an electric shower-waste pump and control unit". The patent was filed on 30 April 2007 and has a priority date of 17 February 2007. It deals with a known problem. In earlier "pump in a box" products the pump and electronics were sealed together, so a leaking pump could flood the box and reach the live circuitry. Claim 1 describes a housing with a first chamber containing the pump, a separate water-tightly sealable second chamber for the control circuitry, and a removable non-watertight housing cover. DLP sued Coram UK Holding Limited in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, alleging that its Premium Pump and Bluetooth Pump infringed. Both pumps are made by a company referred to as Whale. In each product the pump and transformer are mounted on a flat plastic backplate fixed to the wall, and a cover is optional. The Premium Cover is screwed to the wall separately and does not touch the backplate; the Bluetooth Cover slots onto the backplate. By trial, DLP relied on claim 1 as granted and on claims 1 and 7 as it proposed to amend them. Coram counterclaimed that the patent was invalid for lack of novelty and for obviousness over three pieces of prior art: Grumbach, a German patent application; Gontar, a UK patent application; and Quantum, a commercial product. Coram dropped the novelty attack towards the close of the trial and opposed the amendments as adding matter. At the two-day trial on liability only, each side attacked the other's expert. Coram also relied on evidence from Whale to challenge the independence of DLP's expert, Mr Vare.

What did the court decide?

Four things on this page are for subscribers:

  • The decision: what the court actually held
  • The issues: the questions it had to answer
  • The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
  • The case history: every step, court by court

CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.

One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox. Monthly plans start with 7 days free.

Start your free trial or the free weekly digest

On your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.