Tax Law · VAT and Duties Tribunal
Glen Bennett v Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
Checked against the judgment on 6 August 2026 · how we verify
Facts
Glen Bennett travelled with two companions, Andrew Eades and Hector Walters, from their homes in Sheffield to Dover, took a ferry to France and then went on to Adinkerke in Belgium to buy tobacco goods, returning through Calais where they bought alcoholic drinks. On 21 January 2006, on their return to Dover, they were stopped by Customs officers, who concluded that the excise goods in Mr Bennett's Citroen Xantia had been brought into the United Kingdom for commercial purposes. The goods — 18 kgs of hand rolling tobacco, 84 litres of beer, nine litres of wine and two litres of spirits — were seized together with the car. Mr Bennett required the Respondents to bring condemnation proceedings in the magistrates' court, but later asked that they be withdrawn because he could not risk an order for costs against him. The refusal to restore the goods and the car was upheld on a review by Raymond Brenton, communicated by a letter of 10 April 2006, who concluded that this was an importation of tobacco for resale at a profit. Mr Bennett appealed to the tribunal, representing himself and calling Mr Eades, the Respondents calling Mr Brenton.
What did the court decide?
Four things on this page are for subscribers:
- The decision: what the court actually held
- The issues: the questions it had to answer
- The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
- The case history: every step, court by court
CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.
One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.
See the plans Or take the free digestOn your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.