Administrative / Public Law  /  [2008] EWHC 524 (Admin)

Administrative / Public Law · The Administrative Court (Queen's Bench Division)

Hafner & Ors, R (on the application of) v City of Westminsters' Court & Anor

Court The Administrative Court (Queen's Bench Division)Date 5 March 2008Citation [2008] EWHC 524 (Admin)Source Find Case LawAlso filed under Civil Procedure, Criminal Law

Checked against the judgment on 28 August 2026 · how we verify

Facts

The first claimant, Benno Hafner, is a Swiss lawyer and a partner in Hafner and Hochstrasser, the second claimant. In 2003 the Australian Securities and Investments Commission began investigating Rene Rivkin (who died on 1 May 2005), Trevor Kennedy and Graham Richardson, alleging that Mr Rivkin and Mr Kennedy had used Swiss financial institutions to hold shares in an Australian company so as to conceal their beneficial ownership, and that all three had committed perjury. On 17 December 2004 the Attorney General of Australia made a request for assistance in obtaining evidence in the United Kingdom under section 13 of the Crime (International Co-Operation) Act 2003, supplemented on 18 April 2005, seeking documents and answers to 554 questions from two employees of Mees Pierson Intertrust Limited in London. The claimants learned that they featured in the request and objected that the material included matter subject to legal professional privilege and Swiss confidentiality, engaging their rights under Article 8 of the Convention. Following an order of Collins J of 24 November 2006 embodying a procedure agreed between the claimants and ASIC, District Judge Purdy declined to adopt the agreed directions and on 27 March 2007 ruled that all the material fell within the request and that Article 8 was "not engaged in any way, shape or form". Judicial review of that decision was restored, permission to amend having been granted by Silber J on 10 September 2007.

What did the court decide?

Four things on this page are for subscribers:

  • The decision: what the court actually held
  • The issues: the questions it had to answer
  • The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
  • The case history: every step, court by court

CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.

One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.

See the plans Or take the free digest

On your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.