Civil Procedure  /  [2026] EWHC 807 (Comm)

Civil Procedure · The Business and Property Courts (Commercial Court)

Alta Trading UK Limited & Ors v Peter Miles Bosworth & Ors

Court The Business and Property Courts (Commercial Court)Date 1 April 2026Citation [2026] EWHC 807 (Comm)Source Find Case Law

Checked against the judgment on 23 September 2026 · how we verify

Facts

The claimants, four companies including Farahead Holdings Limited and the former Arcadia Petroleum Limited, sued former managers and associated companies. They alleged a substantial and sustained fraud in 144 crude oil purchase and sale transactions between April 2007 and May 2013, involving oil originating in West Africa. A worldwide freezing order stayed in place for about ten years. By a judgment of 22 January 2025, Henshaw J dismissed the fraud claims, and the freezing order was discharged. The First, Second and Fifth Defendants then sought compensation in an Inquiry into Damages, listed for trial from 21 April 2026. They said that, but for the freezing order, they could have pursued lucrative business and employment opportunities. The claimants denied that the freezing order caused any loss. In reply, the defendants alleged that the claimants, acting through named individuals, had made allegations they knew to be false. In a judgment of 21 October 2025, the judge held that this 'dishonesty issue' had a realistic prospect of being relevant to causation. A later CMC order then directed Model D disclosure on the Dishonesty Issues for Disclosure. The claimants disclosed 24 documents relevant to those issues and withheld 2,380 documents for privilege, 1,203 of which they said responded to the dishonesty issues. By an application issued on 4 March 2026 and heard on 23 March 2026, the First and Second Defendants sought three things: production of the 'Investigation Documents' from the claimants' internal investigations of 2013 to 2015; production of the file of Diligence, a firm of private investigators; and a revised disclosure certificate, list or witness statement justifying the claimants' privilege claims.

What did the court decide?

Four things on this page are for subscribers:

  • The decision: what the court actually held
  • The issues: the questions it had to answer
  • The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
  • The case history: every step, court by court

CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.

One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.

See the plans Or take the free digest

On your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.