Company Law  /  [2026] EWHC 2386 (Ch)

Company Law · The Business and Property Courts (Insolvency and Companies List)

Lloyd Edward Hinton v Dr Marek Stobinski

Court The Business and Property Courts (Insolvency and Companies List)Date 22 September 2026Citation [2026] EWHC 2386 (Ch)Source Find Case LawAlso filed under Civil Procedure

Checked against the judgment on 22 September 2026 · how we verify

Facts

The applicant, Lloyd Hinton, is the liquidator of St. Mark Lions Limited. The company was incorporated on 19 March 2015 and entered creditors' voluntary liquidation on 12 October 2022. The respondent, Dr Marek Stobinski, a medical doctor, was its sole director and shareholder, and the company appears to have been a service company for some of his medical work. Almost no books and records were delivered up. After an HMRC compliance check, the company's accountants prepared amended accounts, which Dr Stobinski approved. For the last accounting period, they showed 'Other Debtors' of £112,506. Corporation tax had meanwhile been left unpaid year after year. The Liquidator applied under rule 1.35 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, mainly relying on section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986, and claimed £214,195.29 plus interest. That sum was made up of three elements: the £112,506 balance, said to be an overdrawn director's loan account; £63,189.29 of unexplained 'Other Payments'; and £38,500 paid to Dr Stobinski and described as 'MGMT CHARGE'. The Liquidator alleged breaches of sections 171, 172, 174 and 175 of the Companies Act 2006 while the company was insolvent or bordering on insolvency. In the alternative, he claimed the loan account balance as a simple debt. Dr Stobinski disputed the loan account and argued that the debt claim could not be brought under section 212 and was a nullity. There was also an alternative claim under section 238 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The application was tried before a Deputy ICC Judge.

What did the court decide?

Four things on this page are for subscribers:

  • The decision: what the court actually held
  • The issues: the questions it had to answer
  • The reasoning: how it got there, in its own logic
  • The case history: every step, court by court

CaseLawDigest reads every judgment published on Find Case Law for England and Wales, files it by practice area, and writes a summary a practitioner can use. One weekly PDF per area, and the full archive here.

One practice area is £19 a month, and the weekly PDF lands in your inbox.

See the plans Or take the free digest

On your firm’s subscription? Set up your access. Already have an account? Sign in.